<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://danube.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Danube - Scrum Hype vs. Scrum Education - Comments</title>
 <link>http://danube.com/blog/michaeljames/scrum_hype_vs_scrum_education</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Scrum Hype vs. Scrum Education&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>great post Michael</title>
 <link>http://danube.com/blog/michaeljames/scrum_hype_vs_scrum_education#comment-5994</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;great post Michael&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:51:44 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anony</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5994 at http://danube.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Scrum Hype vs. Scrum Education</title>
 <link>http://danube.com/blog/michaeljames/scrum_hype_vs_scrum_education</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;From time to time we see people complaining about Scrum and Agile being sold as a magic painless solution to all your problems.  We can&#039;t seem to catch anyone in the act of making these claims.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So who&#039;s going around saying Scrum is a silver bullet, and that it&#039;s all you need?  Ken Schwaber&#039;s not saying this; Danube isn&#039;t saying this; other Scrum trainers and coaches aren&#039;t saying this ... at least not when I&#039;m around.  We&#039;re all saying quite the opposite.  I see more complaints about hype than actual hype.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://danube.com/blog/michaeljames/scrum_hype_vs_scrum_education&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://danube.com/blog/michaeljames/scrum_hype_vs_scrum_education#comment</comments>
 <enclosure url="http://danube.com/system/files/Scrum+Hype+vs+Scrum+Education+blog.pdf" length="120363" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:04:03 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MichaelJames</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1140 at http://danube.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
