<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://danube.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Danube - Simple, But Very Hard - Comments</title>
 <link>http://danube.com/blog/victorszalvay/simple_but_very_hard.html</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Simple, But Very Hard&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Simple, But Very Hard</title>
 <link>http://danube.com/blog/victorszalvay/simple_but_very_hard.html</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ken Schwaber&#039;s comments in &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/12506&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; scrumdevelopment thread are fantastic; we need to keep in mind that Scrum is a set of principles, not a call to follow a brainless list of processes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I like something I heard Ken say during his course: Scrum is simple but very hard to do.  Then he proceeded with an analogy to chess.  We can all learn chess moves in a few hours, but mastery of the game takes a lot more.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So what does it take to be successful at a game like chess?  I have some insight into this because much of my family plays chess, some even competitively.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://danube.com/blog/victorszalvay/simple_but_very_hard.html&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://danube.com/blog/victorszalvay/simple_but_very_hard.html#comment</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:22:33 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>VictorSzalvay</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">335 at http://danube.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
